<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Philosophy on Amitav Krishna</title>
    <link>https://amitav.net/tags/philosophy.html</link>
    <description>Recent content in Philosophy on Amitav Krishna</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.146.6</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 18:55:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://amitav.net/tags/philosophy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Why is some philosophy so math-ish?</title>
      <link>https://amitav.net/posts/why-is-some-philosophy-so-math-ish.html</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 18:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://amitav.net/posts/why-is-some-philosophy-so-math-ish.html</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hello!  Quick throwaway post here.  I was reading &lt;a href=&#34;https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5506078de4b02d88372eee4e/t/5bc723b5104c7bf5cc8f3881/1539777748456/MacAskill-Normative-Uncertainty.pdf&#34;&gt;Normative Uncertainty&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href=&#34;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_MacAskill&#34;&gt;William MacAskill&lt;/a&gt;(Effective Altruism man) when I was flashbanged by the math.  After some chatting with claude, apparently this is what makes analytic philosophy notable, as opposed to continental philosophy which is focused on society, culture, etc.  What they don&amp;rsquo;t learn about apparently is &lt;em&gt;analysis&lt;/em&gt;, which unlike &lt;em&gt;logic&lt;/em&gt;, deals with continuous things.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=&#34;Meme comparing continental and analytic philosophy&#34; loading=&#34;lazy&#34; src=&#34;https://amitav.net/images/analyticvscontinentalphilosophymeme.jpg&#34;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
